Amavasya
tarpanam is the offering of water mixed with gingelly to the dead ancestors and
it means “That offering which satisfies (our pitrus)”. The offering is
addressed to three generations of father, grand father and great grand father
along with their wives in one’s family and maternal grand father, his father
and grand father along with their wives in our mother's birth family. Only those
whose father is dead are eligible to do tarpanam. If maternal grand father is
alive tarpanam is not done for his family but restricted to one’s family.
Dead ancestors are
supposed to live in Pithru loka for some time and either reborn as any being or
are in lokas like deva loka, Vaikunta etc or even attained salvation by merging
with god. The pithru loka is populated by three group of pithru devas viz,
Vasu, Rudra and Adhithya. These devas receive our oblations and make it reach
to our ancestors wherever they are and in whichever form they are. The pithru
loka is supposed to be on the unseen side of the moon. This portion gets
exposed to sun on the new moon days. It is lunch time for the people populating
the pithru loka. These pithrus — since they have left the world and are solely
dependent on only their progenies to feed them — feeding them through tarpanams
assumes importance and therefore it is assumed anyone not doing it will be
cursed by Pithru devas leading to absence of male descendents to offer tarpanam
to us when we are dead and gone.
Nobody knows for sure
what happens to the soul once it leaves the body. Suppose the soul has been
reborn as per the karma theory? If our pitrus are reborn than whom are we
feeding? Chances are that dead man would have been born sooner than later
rather than he being irretrievably merging with God. Probably for
saints like Tyagaraja this could hold true. But for millions of us we can sense
the truth of being trapped in cycle of births and deaths owing to our sins that
brought us to this earth in the first place. However we are ready to argue and
fight till eternity that pitrus are waiting to be fed by us on the premise that
our sastras can “never be wrong” and if someone refuses to agree to our views
we can straightaway abuse him calling him names to show that how wiser we are
indeed in our commitment to sastras.
The point is we have wilfully shaped our
belief as definitive and refuse to except a differing viewpoint especially if
someone with a different religious denomination disagrees with us.
Once a close Muslim friend of mine told me, “why bother and waste money on a
dead man once he is laid to rest? Forget him.” Should we take it as hurting our
sentiments by an Islamist who cannot but be “anti-Hindu” or should we ponder if
there is some truth in what he said? Nobody can say or dare say he holds the
patent for the esoteric truth when no saint has even dared to do it. {For those who are waiting to pounce
on me that I am questioning the very core of sastras and not intent on
preserving Brahminism I wish to say that I am a believer in tarpanams and
sradhams}
True, for many of us when we practice age old rituals we feel satisfied and feel there is less tension after we dutifully do the act and see our vadiyar go home satisfied. We feel God will reward us many times more than we paid the vadiyar. It acts as a soothing balm to our troubled mind. The real problem is when we consider rituals as en end in itself it becomes dangerous as we go overboard tending to undervalue the living. Many of us would happily neglect our parents, especially in their old age, than miss performing elaborate sradhams after they are gone. This is a tragedy as the honour for the living comes too late.
No comments:
Post a Comment